GUEST ARTICLE
The Resurrection
of the Human Body
In his defense before Agrippa,
Paul asked his Jewish audience: “Why is it judged incredible
with you, if God doth raise the dead?” (Acts 26:8). There
have always been those who found the concept of the bodily
resurrection unbelievable, and their modern counterparts
are appearing increasingly—even in within the framework
of “Christendom.”
False Ideas
The ancient Greeks disdained
the notion that the body could ever be raised. Thus when
Paul spoke concerning “the resurrection of the dead [ones – plural]” in
Athens, his message was mocked (Acts 17:32).
During the time of Jesus, the
Sadducees denied the resurrection of the body (Matthew
22:23; Acts 23:6-8).
Even some Christians in the
primitive church had fallen for this error, and so affirmed: “There
is no resurrection of the dead” (1 Corinthians 15:12)—a
heresy which Paul attempted to correct.
In the late decades of the
apostolic age, a sect known as the Gnostics arose, denying
the resurrection of the body.
In our own age, atheism, of
course, rejects the idea that the human body will be raised
from the dead. An article in the Soviet Encyclopedia asserts
that the concept of the resurrection is in “decisive contradiction
with scientific natural knowledge” (quoted in Smith 1999,
455).
Of course religious modernism
repudiates the idea of the resurrection, since, having “demythologized” the
Scriptures, it rejects any element of the miraculous.
Cultish groups also have a
problem with the doctrine that God will raise the body.
The Jehovah’s Witnesses assert that the incorrigibly wicked “will
never be remembered for resurrection” (Make Sure of
All Things, 314).
There are those who have converted
to the dogma of radical preterism and deny the future resurrection.
Like Hymenaeus and Philetus, men who erred in Paul’s day,
these folks suggest that the “resurrection is past already” (2
Tim. 2:17,18), having been spiritually effected
in A.D. 70 with the destruction of
Jerusalem.
Whether ancient or modern,
within the church or outside of it, the denial of the bodily
resurrection is radical error. And in this age of biblical
illiteracy, this false doctrine will continue to make its
presence felt among the people of God unless gospel teachers
return to a proclamation of the fundamental principles
of the Christian faith, one of which is the “resurrection
of the dead” (cf. Heb. 6:1,2).
The Bible and the Resurrection
The Bible clearly affirms the
doctrine of the general resurrection of the dead. Note,
in brief, the following points.
The concept of the resurrection
is found in the Old Testament – though not as pronounced
as it comes to light in the New Testament (cf. 2 Tim. 1:10).
According to Jesus, God’s declaration to Moses regarding
Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob was an indication of the eventual
resurrection (Mt. 22:31,32). Other Old Testament passages
also suggested that man’s body would be raised ultimately
(see Job 19:25-27; Psa. 17:15; Isa. 26:19; Dan. 12:2; Hos.
13:14).
The doctrine of the bodily
resurrection is affirmed abundantly in the New Testament
(see Jn. 5:28-29; 6:39-40; Mk. 12:18-27; Acts 17:32; 26:8;
Rom. 8:23; 1 Thes. 4:16; 1 Cor. 15; 2 Cor. 5:1-2; Phil.
3:21).
How any person can read Paul’s
great discussion of the eventual disposition of the dead – in
1 Corinthians, chapter 15 – and not believe in the resurrection,
has to be one of the mysteries of the ages. In that remarkable
chapter the apostle develops his line of argumentation
in the following fashion.
Paul persuasively pled for
the historical fact of the bodily resurrection of Jesus
Christ on the basis of numerous eyewitnesses of the risen
Lord. On one occasion, this consisted of more than 500
people (15:1-11).
The apostle maintained that
the Lord’s resurrection is Heaven’s guarantee that we too
shall be raised. Jesus is the “first-fruits” (a figure
suggesting a future harvest) of the general resurrection
to be effected at the time of His return (vv. 12-34).
Paul discussed the nature of
the resurrected body. It will not be a physical or a corruptible
body; rather, it will be spiritual and incorruptible (vv.
35-49). Nevertheless, there will be an identity continuum
between our present body and the new, resurrected one.
Only in this light can the term “resurrection” (which means
to “stand up”) have any relevance. Moreover, each body
will have its own individuality (v. 38). It is so thrilling
to reflect upon the fact that our new body will be identical
in form to the glorious body of our resurrected Lord (see
Phil. 3:21).
Finally, the theological impact
of the resurrection is set forth. It is a declaration of
victory (vv. 50-57). In view of this great hope, saints
are admonished to persevere in their fidelity (v. 58).
The biblical doctrine of the
resurrection of the dead is a comforting concept. Those
who would rob us of this hope are not friends of the cause
of Christ.
--Wayne Jackson
Sources/Footnotes
- Smith, Wilbur M. 1999. Wycliffe
Dictionary of Theology. Everett Harrison, Geoffrey
W. Bromily, Carl F. Henry, eds. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.
christiancourier.com/articles
/107-the-resurrection-of-the-human-body
|